Immigrants Face Deportation to Unrelated Countries Amid Asylum Claims
An Afghan man, having fled the Taliban, found himself in upstate New York seeking refuge, only to face deportation to Uganda. Meanwhile, a Cuban woman working at a Texas Chick-fil-A was arrested due to a minor traffic incident and informed she would be sent to Ecuador.
Across the United States, a Mauritanian man in Michigan was also directed to Uganda, while a Venezuelan mother in Ohio learned she would be sent to Ecuador. Additionally, Bolivians, Ecuadorians, and many others have received deportation orders to Honduras.
These individuals are among over 13,000 immigrants legally residing in the U.S. who suddenly received third-country expulsion orders during their pending asylum claims, highlighted Mobile Pathways, a nonprofit advocating for transparency in immigration processes. The abrupt shift has left many in a state of uncertainty, unable to present their asylum cases in court, and grappling with fears of deportation to countries they have never visited.
Despite the White House’s ongoing push for increased deportations, few individuals have been removed from the country so far. Many now find themselves in a limbo where they can no longer work legally or enjoy the rights previously afforded to them, exacerbating anxiety in immigrant communities.
Experts suggest this situation is intentional, aimed at instilling fear among immigrants. Cassandra Charles, a senior staff attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, criticized the administration’s strategy, alleging that inducing fear may drive immigrants to abandon their claims and return to their home countries.
Recent developments indicate a potential shift in policy. In mid-March, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent an email to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) field attorneys halting new deportation claims to third countries in relation to asylum cases. This decision, which lacked public disclosure and reason, raises questions about its permanence and potential effect on ongoing deportation cases.
A significant case illustrates the distress faced by asylum seekers. A Guatemalan woman, who endured captivity and sexual assault by gang members, arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border seeking asylum with her young daughter. In court, she learned that instead of returning to Guatemala, she would be deported to one of three countries: Ecuador, Honduras, or Uganda—nations she had never heard of. Speaking anonymously for fear of retribution, she expressed her panic over being sent to places she associates with violence and danger.
The trend toward terminating asylum claims accelerated after a ruling by the Justice Department’s Immigration Appeals Board established a legal basis for transferring asylum seekers to third countries deemed safe. Following this ruling, the government quickly expanded its practice of canceling asylum applications, resulting in the deportation orders for thousands.
Data from Mobile Pathways shows that over 13,000 immigrants have faced deportation to so-called “safe third countries” following the cancellation of their asylum requests, with many ordered to Honduras, Ecuador, and Uganda. Although these deported individuals theoretically have the right to seek asylum in those countries, the effectiveness of such refugee systems remains uncertain.
While fewer than 100 asylum seekers are believed to have been forcibly returned to other nations thus far, the legal complexities involved in deportations pose challenges for the U.S. government. The DHS underscores that current agreements allow for asylum seekers to apply for protection in alternate countries. However, logistical and legal hurdles continue to complicate the deportation process.
As immigration authorities grapple with operational limitations, evidencing discrepancies between deportation orders and actual returns, many attorneys suspect that the recent email indicates a shift in strategy. With increased hiring within ICE and potential new agreements, the administration may soon ramp up deportations, sending more individuals to further foreign destinations.
This evolving situation underscores the intricate realities faced by countless immigrants as they navigate an increasingly formidable U.S. immigration system.
___
Contributors to this report include Garance Burke in San Francisco, Joshua Goodman in Miami, Rodney Muhumuza in Kampala, Uganda, Marlon Gonzalez in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, and Molly A. Wallace in Chicago.
