Comments Spark Controversy Over Nnamdi Kanu’s Detention
Ejimofor Opara, the Special Adviser on Media to Anambra State Governor Prof. Chukwuma Soludo, has criticized remarks made by Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, regarding the continued detention of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Obi recently commented during an engagement with Nigerians in Washington, D.C., asserting that Kanu’s ongoing imprisonment lacks legitimacy and reiterating his call for Kanu’s release.
Background of the Obedient Movement’s Remarks
The Obedient Movement, representing Obi’s supporters, stated that the engagement in question occurred several days prior. In a video that has circulated widely on social media, the former governor of Anambra emphasized his long-standing position that Kanu should not remain in custody.
Opara’s Response to Obi’s Statements
In a statement issued to the press on Sunday, Opara characterized Obi’s comments as a “serious slap in the face” to the Nigerian judiciary and an affront to the Finnish judicial system, where Simon Ekpa, Kanu’s associate, faced trial and is currently serving a six-year sentence on terrorism-related charges.
Allegations of Judicial Disrespect
Opara accused Obi of making careless and self-serving remarks, suggesting they undermine the judiciary that has previously aided him. He pointed out that the Nigerian courts played a crucial role in reinstating Obi’s governorship in 2006, and again in 2007 when he faced political challenges.
Importance of Judicial Respect
Opara emphasized that if anyone should honor the Nigerian judiciary, it is Peter Obi. He criticized Obi for making comments that discredit judicial proceedings, noting that the courts have been transparent by live-streaming the proceedings surrounding Kanu’s case to prevent misunderstandings and misstatements.
The Dangers of Politically Motivated Statements
Opara warned that pandering to what he termed “terrorists” is unwise for any candidate approaching an election, especially when the judiciary is committed to fairness. He insinuated that Obi’s remarks reflect a deep-seated disregard for the legal processes at play and cautioned against such miscalculations.
Kanu’s Legal Situation and Ongoing Appeal
Nnamdi Kanu was found guilty of terrorism-related offenses by the Federal High Court in Abuja in November 2025 and is currently serving a life sentence. The court ruled that he was guilty of multiple charges, including incitement and membership in a proscribed organization, along with other charges tied to separatist violence in southeastern Nigeria. Following his conviction, Kanu rejected the verdict and has filed an appeal against both the conviction and the sentence.
