High Court to Rule on Major Defamation Case Involving SERAP and DSS Officials
The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory is set to deliver its judgment on a NOK 5.5 billion defamation lawsuit involving two officials from the Department of State Services (DSS) against the Corporate Trustee of the Socio-Economic Rights and Responsibility Project (SERAP) this Tuesday. The officials allege that on September 9, 2024, DSS operatives unlawfully entered SERAP’s office in Abuja under the guise of a meeting with the organization’s director. SERAP claims that the operatives not only invaded its office but also harassed its staff during the incident.
Allegations of Harassment by DSS Officials
On social media, SERAP conveyed its concerns, stating, “Officials of the Nigerian State Security Service (SSS) are currently illegally occupying SERAP’s offices in Abuja and are demanding a meeting with the company’s directors.” The organization has called on President Tinubu to intervene and stop the alleged harassment and intimidation of Nigerians.
DSS Defends Its Actions as Routine Procedure
In response, the DSS clarified that the visit by officers Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele was part of a routine procedure intended to familiarize them with SERAP’s leadership. However, SERAP reiterated its claims of trespassing and staff assault by DSS operatives. Following weeks of attempts to obtain an official explanation from SERAP concerning what the DSS termed “the facts of the visit,” the officials filed a defamation suit against SERAP. They argue that the charges have caused them significant humiliation and potential disciplinary action.
SERAP Sticks to Its Claims Despite Official Denials
The plaintiffs assert that no break-in occurred and contend that the accusations have tarnished their reputations. Nevertheless, on November 26, 2025, SERAP issued another statement insisting that DSS personnel had indeed trespassed into its Abuja office. Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare emphasized the organization’s commitment to its defense, standing by the affidavit of its lawyers, Tayo Oetigbo SAN and Ebun-Olu Adegboluwa SAN.
Tensions Escalate as Court Proceedings Unfold
During the court sessions, witnesses asserted that no physical assault took place. Oluwadare later informed the court that the allegations of invasion were based on reports from the front desk staff member, Vivian Amadi. The DSS officials, in their lawsuit, accuse SERAP of fabricating claims related to the incident.
Legal Arguments and Implications for Defamation Law
As the plaintiffs’ final written submissions were reviewed, their lawyer, Oluwagbemileke Samuel Kehinde, requested that the court grant all reliefs sought by his clients. He argued for the reduction of SERAP’s public statements and asserted that the defendants had effectively identified the plaintiffs in their alleged defamatory publications.
Historic Ruling on Defamation by Security Officials
Kehinde posited that public awareness of the plaintiffs was not a precondition for filing a defamation lawsuit, asserting that recognition among the defendants’ colleagues suffices. Judge Khalil Yusuf announced that the ruling would be reserved, and all parties would be notified of the decision date. This case could mark a historical moment, as it represents the first instance in Nigeria where a security official has pursued a defamation lawsuit in a personal capacity.
