Federal High Court Introduces New Practice Directions for Pre-Election Matters
The Federal High Court (FHC) has unveiled the Federal High Court (Pre-Election) Practice Directions 2026, aimed at ensuring a fair, impartial, and expedited resolution of pre-election disputes nationwide.
Judicial Empowerment Under Constitutional Mandates
FHC Chief Justice John Tsoho highlighted that the new directives stem from his authority granted by sections 254, 285(9), (10) and (14) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as well as sections 29(5) and 88(2) of the Electoral Act 2026, among other relevant laws.
Enhanced Framework for Election-Related Disputes
In a statement released in Abuja by the Court’s Director of Information, Ms. Catherine Obey Christopher, Mr. Tsoho conveyed that the new framework aims to focus solely on the core issues of electoral disputes while minimizing delays attributed to interlocutory filings.
Streamlining Pre-Election Case Management
Justice Tsoho emphasized the initiative’s goal to reduce the time spent on preliminary challenges, encourage pre-trial settlements, and significantly cut down on postponements related to pre-election hearings. The guidelines align with the Constitution, Electoral Act 2026, and other laws governing electoral matters.
Repeal of Previous Directives and Focus on Efficiency
The Chief Justice announced that the updated rules will replace the 2022 Practice Directions, aiming to enhance the efficiency and expediency of adjudicating politically sensitive cases. The statement affirmed that the Federal High Court of Nigeria has formally issued these Practice Guidelines 2026, underlining their commitment to timely justice.
Operating Hours and Filing Requirements for Pre-Election Cases
To address the sensitive nature of electoral matters, court registries will remain open from 10 AM to 2 PM on Saturdays, Sundays, and public holidays for filing relevant cases. The guidelines stipulate that political parties contesting primary conduct or results must include all pertinent stakeholders as respondents, facilitating effective dispute resolution.
Provisions for Evidence and Communication
Under the new framework, pre-election cases will commence via subpoena, unless allegations involve fraud or other complex issues that necessitate witness testimonies. The court may also subpoena individuals for document production and examination during proceedings. Furthermore, to enhance operational efficiency, lawyers will receive notifications of urgent court activities through email and digital communication platforms, and judges may conduct virtual hearings when necessary.
Timeliness and Limitations on Postponements
Upon completion of filings, the court will schedule hearings within seven days, prioritizing all pre-election matters until a ruling is reached. Additionally, if a party fails to appear at a scheduled hearing despite proper notification, the court may proceed in their absence. The Practice Direction also limits each party to a maximum of two postponements to prevent unnecessary delays in resolving election-related disputes.
