Bauchi Governor Introduces New Political Term Amid Shifting Alliances
Bala Abdulkadir Mohammed, the Governor of Bauchi State and known for his confrontational political approach, recently introduced a novel term to Nigeria’s political discourse: “freelance politician.” His declaration followed a meeting with a delegation of South East ADC stakeholders, led by Peter Obi. The visit aimed to persuade Governor Mohammed to terminate negotiations with the ruling APC and align more closely with the opposition ADC, as early indications suggested that discussions between the PDP and APC had faltered, creating an opening for the ADC.
The media has historically popularized the term “freelance reporter,” likening it to the “daily wage worker” concept familiar in Nigeria’s public and private sectors. “Freelance politician” is a rich and intriguing addition to Nigeria’s evolving political lexicon. Since the introduction of presidential-style politics in 1978, Nigerian political vocabulary has expanded to include terms like zoning, rotation, and vote-buying, illustrating the complex and often tumultuous nature of the country’s political landscape.
According to Governor Mohammed, freelance politicians operate independently of any political party, a notion that raises questions regarding its compatibility with both the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act. These legal frameworks do not envision electoral candidacy outside of political party affiliations. Nonetheless, since 2000, numerous non-party actors, such as the Afenifere, Ohanaeze Ndi Igbo, and Arewa Consultative Forum, have played significant roles in Nigeria’s political sphere without formal party affiliation. In contrast, groups like the Indigenous People of Biafra and Boko Haram have pursued their objectives through violent means, straying from established political processes.
The term “freelance politician” evokes memories of a historical exchange in the Philippines during late 1979. Amidst national upheaval, dictator Ferdinand Marcos faced criticism from Cardinal Jaime Sin, leading to a humorous exchange between Marcos and Sin. As political environments shift, similar dynamics appear to be emerging in Nigeria, where the notion of independent political actors is becoming more pronounced.
Governor Mohammed’s description of freelance politicians implies a landscape where political parties may lack cohesive ideologies or unifying policy frameworks, instead relying on ethnic allegiances and individual politicians’ charisma to attract supporters. At one point, Nigeria boasted nearly 100 registered political parties, many of which struggled for relevance and voter recognition, illustrating the chaotic nature of its electoral process.
If freelance politicians exist, one might ponder the concept of freelance supporters and their roles in shaping electoral outcomes. There are stories of individuals who have cheered for multiple candidates from different parties at various rallies, a clear reflection of opportunistic political support. Recent events in northern states reveal how dedicated supporters navigate the political landscape, often adapting to the interests of prominent figures.
The presence of freelance marabouts, babalawos, and shrine priests is also notable in Nigeria’s electoral dynamics. These spiritual figures often convince candidates of their potential for victory, exploiting candidates’ aspirations for personal gain. Similarly, freelance election administrators frequently populate the landscape during elections, with temporary officials sometimes aligned with specific political factions, further complicating the integrity of the electoral process.
The implications of “freelance” extend beyond politicians to election management and judicial roles, with historical instances showcasing profound lapses in electoral integrity. As freelance elements infiltrate all levels of governance and electoral processes, questions surrounding fairness and accountability in Nigeria’s political arena continue to deepen. This evolving paradigm invites scrutiny, raising critical discussions about the future of politics in a nation still grappling with its identity and direction.
